Re: row literal problem
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-07-18T19:30:05Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 07/18/2012 03:18 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote: >> there are no null fields, right? if the last field is sometimes null >> you'd see that (you probably ruled that out though). when you say >> 'sometimes', do you mean for some rows and not others? or for some >> queries? > No, the inner query has two fields. > It happens for all rows, but not for all two-field-resulting queries as > q. I'm trying to find a simple case rather than the rather complex query > my customer is using. I'm wondering about a rowtype with a third, dropped column. regards, tom lane