Re: executor relation handling
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: > On 2018/10/04 5:16, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think that we ought to adjust parallel query to insist that children >> do take locks, and then revert the IsParallelWorker() exceptions I made >> here. > Maybe I'm missing something here, but isn't the necessary adjustment just > that the relations are opened with locks if inside a parallel worker? Yeah, that's one plausible way to fix it. I hadn't wanted to prejudge the best way before we finish the other changes, though. > I've rebased the remaining patches. I broke down one of the patches into > 2 and re-ordered the patches as follows: Thanks, will start looking at these today. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Avoid O(N^2) cost in ExecFindRowMark().
- f9eb7c14b08d 12.0 landed
-
Remove some unnecessary fields from Plan trees.
- 52ed730d511b 12.0 landed
-
Restore sane locking behavior during parallel query.
- 29ef2b310da9 12.0 landed
-
Remove more redundant relation locking during executor startup.
- f2343653f5b2 12.0 landed
-
In the executor, use an array of pointers to access the rangetable.
- d73f4c74dd34 12.0 landed
-
Centralize executor's opening/closing of Relations for rangetable entries.
- 9ddef36278a9 12.0 landed
-
Change executor to just Assert that table locks were already obtained.
- 9a3cebeaa7fd 12.0 landed
-
Change rewriter/planner/executor/plancache to depend on RTE rellockmode.
- 6e35939febf8 12.0 landed
-
Add assertions that we hold some relevant lock during relation open.
- b04aeb0a053e 12.0 landed
-
Create an RTE field to record the query's lock mode for each relation.
- fdba460a26af 12.0 landed