Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 1:01 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Assuming that's how 9.2 ships, we might as well wait to see if there
>> are any real complaints from the field before we decide whether any
>> changing is needed.

> We could add it to the catalog without forcing an initdb.

Ugh.

> If we're just leaving it, should we take it off the open items list,
> or leave it in there "in case something else shows up"?

Let's just take it off the list.

			regards, tom lane