Thread

Commits

  1. Suppress implicit-conversion warnings seen with newer clang versions.

  1. Today's failures on buildfarm member longfin

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2017-03-28T15:25:08Z

    Last night I updated longfin's host to the latest macOS and XCode point
    releases.  That brought with it a new clang version which is slightly
    pickier than the old: it's complaining about
    
    log.c:5047:16: error: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 255 to -1 [-Werror,-Wconstant-conversion]
            *(recptr++) = XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT;
                        ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    ../../../../src/include/access/xlogrecord.h:223:34: note: expanded from macro 'XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT'
    #define XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT         255
                                            ^~~
    
    (Manual investigation reveals there's about 5 of these altogether;
    longfin's report stops with the first.)
    
    Aleksander Alekseev complained about this previously in
    https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170220141239.GD12278@e733.localdomain
    That thread went off into the weeds discussing whether or not we wanted
    to do something about clang breaking autoconf's test for whether strlcpy
    is declared, which we didn't particularly; but we forgot about the other
    issues.
    
    Since, per previous agreement[1], longfin is running with -Werror, we
    either have to do something about this or revert the decision to make it
    use -Werror --- and I'm not too pleased about the latter idea.  We should
    not have made that agreement if we were going to abandon it at the first
    sign of pain.
    
    As noted in the other thread, we could either fix this in a
    quick-and-dirty way by casting XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT and related
    values to "char" explicitly, or we could run around and change the
    target pointer variables to be "unsigned char *".  The latter could
    prove to be pretty invasive if we try to carry it out fully, while
    if we don't, then we're arguably just moving the ugly casts someplace
    else.
    
    Opinions?
    
    			regards, tom lane
    
    [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/32279.1487355685@sss.pgh.pa.us
    
    
    
  2. Re: Today's failures on buildfarm member longfin

    Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> — 2017-03-28T15:27:44Z

    On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 11:25 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
    > As noted in the other thread, we could either fix this in a
    > quick-and-dirty way by casting XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT and related
    > values to "char" explicitly, or we could run around and change the
    > target pointer variables to be "unsigned char *".  The latter could
    > prove to be pretty invasive if we try to carry it out fully, while
    > if we don't, then we're arguably just moving the ugly casts someplace
    > else.
    >
    > Opinions?
    
    signed char sucks.  Let's hit it with a stick.
    
    :-)
    
    -- 
    Robert Haas
    EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
    The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
    
    
    
  3. Re: Today's failures on buildfarm member longfin

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> — 2017-03-28T15:31:18Z

    On 2017-03-28 11:25:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
    > Last night I updated longfin's host to the latest macOS and XCode point
    > releases.  That brought with it a new clang version which is slightly
    > pickier than the old: it's complaining about
    > 
    > log.c:5047:16: error: implicit conversion from 'int' to 'char' changes value from 255 to -1 [-Werror,-Wconstant-conversion]
    >         *(recptr++) = XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT;
    >                     ~ ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    > ../../../../src/include/access/xlogrecord.h:223:34: note: expanded from macro 'XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT'
    > #define XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT         255
    >                                         ^~~
    > 
    > (Manual investigation reveals there's about 5 of these altogether;
    > longfin's report stops with the first.)
    
    > Since, per previous agreement[1], longfin is running with -Werror, we
    > either have to do something about this or revert the decision to make it
    > use -Werror --- and I'm not too pleased about the latter idea.  We should
    > not have made that agreement if we were going to abandon it at the first
    > sign of pain.
    
    If necessary we could do that more targeted with
    -Wno-error=constant-conversion, but I think we should just fix this.
    
    
    > As noted in the other thread, we could either fix this in a
    > quick-and-dirty way by casting XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT and related
    > values to "char" explicitly, or we could run around and change the
    > target pointer variables to be "unsigned char *".  The latter could
    > prove to be pretty invasive if we try to carry it out fully, while
    > if we don't, then we're arguably just moving the ugly casts someplace
    > else.
    
    I think both are ok with me.  Could also just use memcpy instead of
    direct assignment, but that seems too complicated.  I'd personally just
    go with Aleksander's casts.
    
    Greetings,
    
    Andres Freund
    
    
    
  4. Re: Today's failures on buildfarm member longfin

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2017-03-28T15:56:20Z

    Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
    > On 2017-03-28 11:25:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
    >> Since, per previous agreement[1], longfin is running with -Werror, we
    >> either have to do something about this or revert the decision to make it
    >> use -Werror --- and I'm not too pleased about the latter idea.  We should
    >> not have made that agreement if we were going to abandon it at the first
    >> sign of pain.
    
    > If necessary we could do that more targeted with
    > -Wno-error=constant-conversion, but I think we should just fix this.
    
    Yeah, that option seems like it would lose important error detection.
    
    >> As noted in the other thread, we could either fix this in a
    >> quick-and-dirty way by casting XLR_BLOCK_ID_DATA_SHORT and related
    >> values to "char" explicitly, or we could run around and change the
    >> target pointer variables to be "unsigned char *".
    
    > I think both are ok with me.  Could also just use memcpy instead of
    > direct assignment, but that seems too complicated.  I'd personally just
    > go with Aleksander's casts.
    
    Further investigation says that these warnings now also appear in the
    9.5 and 9.6 branches, which were previously warning-clean except for
    ye olde unused-variable flex bug.  So I'd like a solution that can be
    back-patched, which says that the localized casts to char are the way to
    go.  Maybe somebody else will want to undertake a more general cleanup,
    but I don't want to spend time on that right now.
    
    			regards, tom lane