Horton

Re: timeout implementation issues

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: Jessica Perry Hekman <jphekman@dynamicdiagrams.com>, Hiroshi Inoue <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>, Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>, Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2002-04-07T02:20:39Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Ewe, I was hoping for something with zero overhead for the non-SET case.

Well, a function call and immediate return if no SET has been executed
in the current xact seems low enough overhead to me.  We'll just keep
a flag showing whether there's anything to do.

			regards, tom lane