Re: GCC vs clang

Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com> writes:
> I've been trying to get clang working enough that I can at 
> least get HEAD going for a build farm client, and the attached 
> patch is the bare minimum to get it working. There may be a 
> better way to do this, but as indicated in a past thread, the 
> GNU_SOURCE variable does not play nicely with clang. Getting that 
> removed does allow me to do a working make and make check. The make 
> takes orders of magnitude longer than gcc does, but that's an 
> issue for another day.

What happens to plperl?

			regards, tom lane