Re: Re: New relkind for views
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-10-17T00:56:17Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Mark Hollomon <mhh@mindspring.com> writes: >>>> I say let them drop it with either one. >> >> I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop >> table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are >> pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :) > So the vote is now tied. Any other opinions I vote for the fascist approach (command must agree with actual type of object). Seems safest. Please make sure the error message is helpful though, like "Use DROP SEQUENCE to drop a sequence". regards, tom lane