Re: Pre-proposal: unicode normalized text
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>,
Isaac Morland <isaac.morland@gmail.com>,
Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>, Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>,
pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2023-10-05T19:49:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Try again to fix the MSVC build
- 151ffcf6d8c1 17.0 landed
-
Additional unicode primitive functions.
- a02b37fc0832 17.0 landed
Nico Williams <nico@cryptonector.com> writes: > Text+encoding can be just like bytea with a one- or two-byte prefix > indicating what codeset+encoding it's in. That'd be how to encode > such text values on the wire, though on disk the column's type should > indicate the codeset+encoding, so no need to add a prefix to the value. The precedent of BOMs (byte order marks) suggests strongly that such a solution would be horrible to use. regards, tom lane