Re: knngist - 0.8
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-28T19:25:15Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >>> Since no one has stepped up to fix these issues, I have marked this >>> patch Returned with Feedback. >> This is just contrib/btree_GIST, yes? > Yes, core KNN was committed by Tom during the November CommitFest. Right. However, it's disappointing that this isn't in, because the number of use cases for KNN-gist in core isn't very large. We really need support for KNN in btree_gist to make it useful. Given that it is a contrib module, I personally wouldn't object to it getting patched later, like during alpha or beta. But somebody's got to do the work, and I've got a dozen higher-priority problems right now. regards, tom lane