Re: Interrupts vs signals
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>,
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>,
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Date: 2024-07-29T17:24:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > I wonder how this works right now. Is there something that limits the > number of authentication requests that can be in flight concurrently, > or is it completely uncapped (except by machine resources)? The former. IIRC, the postmaster won't spawn more than 2X max_connections subprocesses (don't recall the exact limit, but it's around there). regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Ignore SIGINT in walwriter and walsummarizer
- a92b809f9da1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Split WaitEventSet functions to separate source file
- 393e0d231405 18.0 landed
-
Use ModifyWaitEvent to update exit_on_postmaster_death
- 84e5b2f07a5e 18.0 landed
-
Remove unused ShutdownLatchSupport() function
- a98e4dee63ce 18.0 landed
-
Rename two functions that wake up other processes
- 368d8270c838 18.0 landed
-
Use ProcNumbers instead of direct Latch pointers to address other procs
- a9c546a5a378 18.0 landed
-
Clean up WaitLatch calls that passed latch without WL_LATCH_SET
- f9ecb57a506a 18.0 landed
-
Remove unneeded #include
- 094ae071605d 18.0 landed
-
Remove unused latch
- 6c0c49f7d37d 18.0 landed
-
Remove support for background workers without BGWORKER_SHMEM_ACCESS.
- 80a8f95b3bca 15.0 cited