Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-03-12T18:21:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > What you need is an updateable cursor on the server side. It has all the > facilities you need, including standardized ways to find out the > updatability metadata. Please concentrate on that and do not attempt to > clutter the wire protocol with data that will not withstand a throrough > investigation of semantics. So are you voting against adding any attribute-ID info to RowDescription? While I'm not that thrilled with it myself, it seems relatively harmless as long as we can keep the overhead down. I'm okay with attrelid/attnum, but would gripe about including more than that. You're probably right that updatable cursors would be a nicer solution in the long run, but I don't really see that happening in the next release or two. regards, tom lane