Re: Roadmap for FE/BE protocol redesign

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2003-03-12T18:21:51Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> What you need is an updateable cursor on the server side.  It has all the
> facilities you need, including standardized ways to find out the
> updatability metadata.  Please concentrate on that and do not attempt to
> clutter the wire protocol with data that will not withstand a throrough
> investigation of semantics.

So are you voting against adding any attribute-ID info to
RowDescription?  While I'm not that thrilled with it myself, it seems
relatively harmless as long as we can keep the overhead down.  I'm
okay with attrelid/attnum, but would gripe about including more than that.

You're probably right that updatable cursors would be a nicer solution
in the long run, but I don't really see that happening in the next
release or two.

			regards, tom lane