Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

To: Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org>

Cc: Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, Marco Slot <marco.slot@gmail.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>

Date: 2024-11-16T18:00:44Z

Lists: pgsql-hackers

Commits

Same data as JSON: GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources. API reference →

Undo unintentional ABI break in struct ResultRelInfo.
- ee33d58471de 16.6 landed
- 6bfacd368bb4 17.2 landed
- 17db248f318f 15.10 landed
- 099e711b77b8 14.15 landed
For inplace update durability, make heap_update() callers wait.
- 51ff46de29f6 16.5 cited
Fix btmarkpos/btrestrpos array key wraparound bug.
- 3fa81b62e09b 16.1 cited
Fix calculation of which GENERATED columns need to be updated.
- 8cd190e13a22 14.7 cited

Christoph Berg <myon@debian.org> writes:
> Re: Noah Misch
>> I'm no longer arguing against the undo, but I'm trying to explain the
>> consequences rigorously.

> I'll just have to explain what happened here to the Debian security
> team who just released the 16.5 update. We can do 16.6 on top of that.

Fixes are pushed, and we'll wrap new releases next week on the
usual release schedule.

			regards, tom lane