Horton

Re: Need a builtin way to run all tests faster manner

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@openscg.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew.dunstan@2ndquadrant.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-03-11T20:06:47Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Jim Nasby <jim.nasby@openscg.com> writes:
> It's actually a lot harder to mess up providing a git repo link than 
> manually submitting patches to the mailing list.

Yeah, we've heard that proposal before.  We're still not doing it though.
Insisting on patches being actually submitted to the mailing list is
important for archival and possibly legal reasons.  If someone sends
in a link to $random-repo, once that site goes away there's no way to
determine exactly what was submitted.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Improve isolation tests infrastructure.