Re: BUG #5028: CASE returns ELSE value always when type is "char"
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org, "Sam Mason" <sam@samason.me.uk>
Date: 2009-09-01T18:42:42Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Joseph Shraibman <jks@selectacast.net> writes: >>> So the type of what is in the ELSE clause determines the type of >>> the output? >> >> If all the other branches are unknown literals, yes. > What's the best place to look to get a handle on what the benefits are > of treating character string literals as being of unknown type? > (Other than the obvious backward compatibility issues.) I think the odds of changing that are not measurably different from zero. regards, tom lane