Thread

  1. Re: Define DatumGetInt8 function.

    Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2025-12-29T15:52:58Z

    Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill@gmail.com> writes:
    > During this rebase resolution, I noticed that there is an Int8GetDatum
    > function, but there is no DatumGetInt8, which I want to use. All other
    > inline functions seem to be provided in pairs by postgres.h. So it
    > looks convenient to define DatumGetInt8 in postgres.h?
    
    I would actually turn this around and ask why we have Int8GetDatum?
    We have no SQL types for which that is well-adapted.  I see no
    uses of Int8GetDatum in our tree, and only three uses of
    UInt8GetDatum, and all three of those look like type puns to me.
    (heap_page_items is returning a smallint, and btcharskipsupport
    should be using CharGetDatum.)
    
    So from where I sit these look like an attractive nuisance that
    we should remove rather than encourage use of.  If you have
    some extension data type for which these make sense, that's
    fine, but it doesn't mean they should be in core Postgres.
    
    			regards, tom lane