Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4027: backslash escaping notdisabled inplpgsql
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: "Jonathan Guthrie" <jguthrie@brokersys.com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce@momjian.us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2009-04-10T18:57:10Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > The aspect of 8.3 behavior that concerns me most is that neither the > author of a function, nor anyone using it, can control or predict > which way a string literal with a backslash will be interpreted, > unless the author explicitly specifies the SET > standard_conforming_strings clause in the function declaration. Yeah. This is one reason why I'm still afraid to flip the default value of standard_conforming_strings --- there seems too much risk of widespread breakage. I don't have a good solution for it, but I agree it's a problem. regards, tom lane