Re: Replace remaining StrNCpy() by strlcpy()

Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I removed namecpy() altogether because you can just use struct assignment.

Makes sense, and I notice it was unused anyway.

v3 passes eyeball examination (I didn't bother running tests), with
only one remaining nit: the proposed commit message says

	They are equivalent,

which per this thread is incorrect.  Somebody might possibly refer to this
commit for guidance in updating third-party code, so I don't think we want
to leave a misleading claim here.  Perhaps something like

	They are equivalent, except that StrNCpy zero-fills the entire
	destination buffer instead of providing just one trailing zero.
	For all but a tiny number of callers, that's just overhead rather
	than being desirable.

			regards, tom lane