Re: zstd compression for pg_dump

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Cc: Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@enterprisedb.com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion@timescale.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, gkokolatos@pm.me, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>, Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>, Dipesh Pandit <dipesh.pandit@gmail.com>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru>, Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Date: 2023-04-07T02:09:50Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2023 at 05:34:30PM +0200, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> I think that's all for PG16 in this patch series.  If there's more we want to
>> do, it'll have to wait for PG17 - 

> Yes

Shouldn't the CF entry be closed as committed?  It's certainly
making the cfbot unhappy because the patch-of-record doesn't apply.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Support long distance matching for zstd compression

  2. pg_dump: Add support for zstd compression