Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <greg@2ndquadrant.com>,
"KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, "KaiGai Kohei" <kaigai@kaigai.gr.jp>, "Takahiro Itagaki" <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, "Jaime Casanova" <jcasanov@systemguards.com.ec>
Date: 2010-01-24T18:06:16Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes: > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> It might be better to try a test case with lighter-weight objects, >> say 5 million simple functions. > So the current database is expendable? Yeah, I think it was a bad experimental design anyway... regards, tom lane