Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-02-06T22:01:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 2023-02-06 Mo 11:13, Tom Lane wrote:
>> So presumably, changing this test would break it for OpenSSL 0.9.8,
>> which is still nominally supported in those branches.  On the other
>> hand, this test isn't run by default, so users would likely never
>> notice anyway.

> Presumably we don't have any buildfarm animals running with such old 
> versions of openssl, or they would be failing the same test on release 
> >= 13.

That test isn't run by default in the buildfarm either, no?

But indeed, probably nobody in the community is testing such builds
at all.  I did have such setups on my old dinosaur BF animals, but
they bit the dust last year for unrelated reasons.  I wonder how
realistic it is to claim that we still support those old OpenSSL
versions.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Backpatch OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests

  2. OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests

  3. Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0