Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 vs old branches
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2023-02-06T22:01:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > On 2023-02-06 Mo 11:13, Tom Lane wrote: >> So presumably, changing this test would break it for OpenSSL 0.9.8, >> which is still nominally supported in those branches. On the other >> hand, this test isn't run by default, so users would likely never >> notice anyway. > Presumably we don't have any buildfarm animals running with such old > versions of openssl, or they would be failing the same test on release > >= 13. That test isn't run by default in the buildfarm either, no? But indeed, probably nobody in the community is testing such builds at all. I did have such setups on my old dinosaur BF animals, but they bit the dust last year for unrelated reasons. I wonder how realistic it is to claim that we still support those old OpenSSL versions. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Backpatch OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- 6133a0f4c7c3 12.15 landed
- cab553a08e2d 11.20 landed
-
OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility in tests
- f0d2c65f17ca 13.0 cited
-
Remove support for OpenSSL 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
- 7b283d0e1d1d 13.0 cited