Re: BUG #15460: Error while creating index or constraint
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Paul van der Linden <paul.vanderlinden@mapcreator.eu>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>,
PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs@lists.postgresql.org>,
Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Date: 2018-10-29T15:31:10Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Paul van der Linden <paul.vanderlinden@mapcreator.eu> writes: > Trace_sort is attached > ... > LOG: performsort of 0 done: CPU: user: 250.03 s, system: 42.66 s, elapsed: 294.35 s > LOG: parallel external sort of 0 ended, 462886 disk blocks used: CPU: user: 250.03 s, system: 42.66 s, elapsed: 298.95 s > LOG: begin index sort: unique = f, workMem = 2096128, randomAccess = f > LOG: performsort of -1 starting: CPU: user: 0.00 s, system: 0.00 s, elapsed: 0.00 s > LOG: could not rmdir directory "base/pgsql_tmp/pgsql_tmp5088.0.sharedfileset": Directory not empty > ERROR: could not determine size of temporary file "0" "performsort of -1"? Seems a bit suspicious. (And my complaint about inadequate messaging holds here as well. It's really unclear in this trace which digit strings are to be read as numbers and which ones are names of files/filesets. At the very least, these messages violate our message style guidelines: "When citing the name of an object, state what kind of object it is.") regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Have BufFileSize() ereport() on FileSize() failure.
- 1a990b207b86 12.0 landed
- 95c45718126f 11.2 landed
-
Use 64 bit type for BufFileSize().
- fa2ceaca4358 11.2 landed
- aa5518304213 12.0 landed
-
Adjust trace_sort log messages.
- cb6f8a9a7243 12.0 landed
- 886319d71bd5 11.1 landed
-
Fix some sloppiness in the new BufFileSize() and BufFileAppend() functions.
- 445e31bdc749 11.0 cited