Re: Performance problem in textanycat/anytextcat
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-05-16T03:21:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:16 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >>> Is it reasonable to fix this now, and if so should I bump catversion >>> or leave it alone? My own preference is to fix it in pg_proc.h but >>> not touch catversion; but you could argue that different ways. > ok, then is up to you if you think that it is worth an initdb in > beta... i still think is excessive... The point of not wanting to change catversion is to not force an initdb. regards, tom lane