Re: [PATCH 2/5] Make relpathbackend return a statically result instead of palloc()'ing it

Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> To what extent do you want palloc et al. emulation? Provide actual pools
> or just make redirect to malloc and provide the required symbols (at the
> very least CurrentMemoryContext)?

I don't see any need for memory pools, at least not for frontend
applications of the currently envisioned levels of complexity.  I concur
with Alvaro's suggestion about just #define'ing them to malloc/free ---
or maybe better, pg_malloc/free so that we can have a failure-checking
wrapper.

Not sure how we ought to handle elog, but maybe we can put off that bit
of design until we have a more concrete use-case.

			regards, tom lane