Re: Since '2001-09-09 01:46:40'::timestamp microseconds are lost when extracting epoch

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>, David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Petr Fedorov <petr.fedorov@phystech.edu>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2021-04-28T13:43:58Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 3:56 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Of course Wikipedia has been known to contain errors, but now
>> I'm inclined to think I blew this.  Anyone want to check my work?

> I tried a couple of examples not from Wikipedia.  ...

Thanks for checking!  I'll go adjust the documentation.

			regards, tom lane



Commits

  1. Fix inconsistent equalfuncs.c behavior for FuncCall.funcformat.

  2. Doc: fix discussion of how to get real Julian Dates.

  3. Doc: document EXTRACT(JULIAN ...), improve Julian Date explanation.

  4. Change return type of EXTRACT to numeric

  5. Improve our ability to regurgitate SQL-syntax function calls.

  6. Add more tests for EXTRACT of date type

  7. Expose internal function for converting int64 to numeric

  8. Change floating-point output format for improved performance.