Re: win32 socket definition

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 23:17, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> BTW, I trust the non-windows case should be "int".

> Haha, yeah, that was my attempt at producing a warning. Which didn't work :-)

Hmm ... "char *" would provoke warnings, but only in the places that
were using the new definition, which is not what you need to find.

			regards, tom lane