Re: Draft release notes complete
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-05-10T22:15:12Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Expose track_iotiming information via pg_stat_statements.
- 5b4f34661143 9.2.0 cited
-
Rewrite GiST support code for rangetypes.
- 80da9e68fdd7 9.2.0 cited
-
Clean up a couple of box gist helper functions.
- d50e1251946a 9.2.0 cited
-
Replace the "New Linear" GiST split algorithm for boxes and points with a
- 7f3bd86843e5 9.2.0 cited
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: >> It's been said elsewhere that adding all this to the release notes as >> found on the official docs would be too bulky. How about having a >> second copy of the release notes that contains authorship info as >> proposed by Andrew? Then the docs could have no names at all, and >> credit would be given by some other page in the website (to which the >> release notes would link). > Personally, I'd love to have something really simple, with just 3 sections: > "Contributors to PostgreSQL 9.2" > (1) Specific Patch Contributors > patch, original (co) author name > (2) Patch reviewers > list without specific patch affiliation > (3) Other Contributors to this release > anyone who contributed but isn't mentioned above > I think if we get any more complicated, this is going to become a major > chore for someone, and then it won't get done. The other problem with such an approach is that section (1) would be extremely duplicative of the main release-notes text. How about a hybrid: we continue to identify patch authors as now, that is with names attached to the feature/bugfix descriptions, and then have a separate section "Other Contributors" to recognize patch reviewers and other helpers? regards, tom lane