Re: initdb recommendations

I wrote:
> I'm afraid we're going to have to revert this, at least till
> such time as a fixed buildfarm client is in universal use.

> As for the nature of that fix, I don't quite understand why
> the forced -U is there --- maybe we could just remove it?
> But there are multiple places in the buildfarm client that
> have hard-wired references to "buildfarm".

BTW, it looks like the Windows buildfarm critters have a
separate problem: they're failing with

initdb: error: must specify a password for the superuser to enable md5 authentication

One would imagine that even if we'd given a password to initdb,
subsequent connection attempts would fail for lack of a password.
There might not be any practical fix except forcing trust auth
for the Windows critters.

			regards, tom lane