Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2020-04-16T17:03:36Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com> writes: > Le 16/04/2020 à 16:43, Tom Lane a écrit : >> Pierre Giraud <pierre.giraud@dalibo.com> writes: >>> The screenshot attached uses a <dl> tag for the descrition/example block. >> That looks about right, perhaps, but could you be a little clearer about >> how you accomplished that? > Attached you will find the HTML structure with associated styles. > Sorry I haven't tried to do this from the DocBook sources. > I hope this helps though. After a bit of poking at it, I couldn't find another way to do that than using a <variablelist> structure. Which is an annoying amount of markup to be adding to each table cell, but I guess we could live with it. A bigger problem is that docbook applies styles to the <dl> structure that, at least by default, add a LOT of vertical space. Doesn't seem real workable unless we can undo that. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Doc: re-re-revise markup for tables of functions.
- 4ad047a6eac3 13.0 landed
-
Doc: revise formatting of function/operator tables.
- 737d69ffc3cf 13.0 landed