Re: Adding REPACK [concurrently]
Antonin Houska <ah@cybertec.at>
Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think it *is* related. My earlier patch version, which used the
> > PROC_IN_VACUUM flag improperly [1] was also causing visibility issues. Please
> > let me know if you manage to reproduce the issue with v32.
>
> Will try. Just to highlight - first error happened on v31 *without* PROC_IN_REPACK.
I spent some time running the test with your branch (based on v32 as you told
me off-list), but couldn't reproduce the problem.
The related code is in heap_inplace_lock():
/* no known way this can happen */
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_OBJECT_NOT_IN_PREREQUISITE_STATE),
errmsg_internal("attempted to overwrite invisible tuple")));
The only path REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) uses in-place update seems to be:
cluster.c:build_new_indexes() -> index_create_copy() -> index_create() ->
index_build() -> index_update_stats() -> systable_inplace_update_begin()
However I've got no idea how this can be related to REPACK. Since the new
index is not visible to other transactions until REPACK is done, VACUUM should
be the only process able to change the tuple before
heap_inplace_lock(). Indeed, the server log seems to indicate relationship to
VACUUM:
2026-02-01 16:44:58.878 UTC autovacuum worker[22589] LOG: automatic vacuum of table "postgres.pg_catalog.pg_class": index scans: 1
...
2026-02-01 16:44:58.884 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: COMMIT;
2026-02-01 16:44:58.884 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT pg_try_advisory_lock(42)::integer AS gotlock
2026-02-01 16:44:58.884 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT pg_advisory_lock(43);
2026-02-01 16:44:58.884 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: BEGIN;
2026-02-01 16:44:58.884 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: INSERT INTO tbl(j) VALUES (nextval('last_j')) RETURNING j
2026-02-01 16:44:58.885 UTC client backend[12727] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM tbl WHERE j <= 14148
2026-02-01 16:44:58.885 UTC client backend[12734] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM tbl WHERE j <= 14145
2026-02-01 16:44:58.885 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: COMMIT;
2026-02-01 16:44:58.885 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT pg_advisory_unlock(43);
2026-02-01 16:44:58.887 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: BEGIN
--TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ
;
2026-02-01 16:44:58.887 UTC client backend[12737] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT 1;
2026-02-01 16:44:58.891 UTC REPACK decoding worker[22621] FATAL: terminating background worker "REPACK decoding worker" due to administrator command
2026-02-01 16:44:58.896 UTC client backend[12740] 008_repack_concurrently.pl LOG: statement: SELECT COUNT(*) AS count FROM tbl WHERE j <= 14146
2026-02-01 16:44:58.896 UTC client backend[12722] 008_repack_concurrently.pl ERROR: attempted to overwrite invisible tuple
2026-02-01 16:44:58.896 UTC client backend[12722] 008_repack_concurrently.pl STATEMENT: REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) tbl USING INDEX tbl_pkey;
However, VACUUM should not touch the tuple because the scan in
systable_inplace_update_begin() should leave the containing buffer pinned. I
wonder if you managed to hit another existing bug.
--
Antonin Houska
Web: https://www.cybertec-postgresql.com
Commits
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Allow old WAL recycling during REPACK CONCURRENTLY
- 45b02984e2fa 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Advance restart_lsn more eagerly in LogicalConfirmReceivedLocation
- 38470c2c1ea7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove unnecessary signal handler change
- 5d48d3b14e0e 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Improve REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) error messages some more
- 378dffaf8c80 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Revert "Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific"
- 01a80f062146 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Move REPACK (CONCURRENTLY) test out of stock regression tests
- 4b2aa4b39cba 19 (unreleased) landed
-
REPACK: do not require REPLICATION or LOGIN
- 5dbb63fc82b7 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add missing initialization
- 05c401d5786a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Simplify declaration of memcpy target
- 2cff363715ef 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Reserve replication slots specifically for REPACK
- e76d8c749c31 19 (unreleased) landed
-
doc: Add an example of REPACK (CONCURRENTLY)
- 8fb95a8ab6e5 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow logical replication snapshots to be database-specific
- 0d3dba38c777 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Avoid different-size pointer-to-integer cast
- a3b069ef90bd 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Fix valgrind failure
- 5bcc3fbd196c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Add CONCURRENTLY option to REPACK
- 28d534e2ae0a 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Rename cluster.c to repack.c (and corresponding .h)
- c0b53ec06309 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Allow index_create to suppress index_build progress reporting
- caec9d9fadf1 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Make index_concurrently_create_copy more general
- 33bf7318f94c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Document the 'command' column of pg_stat_progress_repack
- a630ac5c2016 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Introduce the REPACK command
- ac58465e0618 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Toggle logical decoding dynamically based on logical slot presence.
- 67c20979ce72 19 (unreleased) cited
-
Split vacuumdb to create vacuuming.c/h
- c4067383cb2c 19 (unreleased) landed
-
Remove ReorderBufferTupleBuf structure.
- 08e6344fd642 17.0 cited
-
Revert changes to CONCURRENTLY that "sped up" Xmin advance
- 042b584c7f7d 14.4 cited
-
VACUUM: ignore indexing operations with CONCURRENTLY
- d9d076222f5b 14.0 cited