Re: Extreme bloating of intarray GiST indexes
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
Cc: postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-04-28T20:01:59Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes: > I'm currently looking at a database which has some extreme bloating of > intarray GiST indexes. As in 1000% bloating in only a few months. This > is not a particularly high-transaction-rate database, so the bloating is > a little surprising; I can only explain it if vacuum wasn't cleaning the > indexes at all, and maybe not even then. > We're currently instrumenting the database so that we can collect a bit > more data on update activity, but in the meantime, has anyone seen > anything like this? 1. What PG version? 2. If new enough to have contrib/pgstattuple, what does pgstattuple() have to say about the index? I'm suspicious that this might be bloat caused by a bad picksplit function, not from having a lot of dead entries in the index. We've fixed several other bogus picksplit functions in contrib in the past. regards, tom lane