Re: RC1?
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>
Cc: "Nigel J. Andrews" <nandrews@investsystems.co.uk>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e@gmx.net>, "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2002-11-14T05:17:40Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: >> How shall we distinguish your version of freebsd from the ones that >> need the other comparison file? > He is using the FreeBSD 3.x series (which is quite old now), whereas most > people are probably using 4.x. I have no problems with regression tests on > 4.x so perhaps it's something that changed?? How do you feel about resultmap entries float8/i.86-.*-freebsd3=float8-fp-exception float8/i.86-.*-freebsd4=float8-small-is-zero to replace the existing float8/i.86-.*-freebsd=float8-small-is-zero Are there (now or in the foreseeable future) freebsd major versions > 4? We could do float8/i.86-.*-freebsd[4-9]=float8-small-is-zero which might or might not be more future-proof. > Actually, I've only tested FreeBSD/alpha 4.x - perhaps I should test intel > as well. <blink> ain't none of the float8 bsd resultmap entries will match alpha... so you must be matching the default version? regards, tom lane