Re: invalid search_path complaints
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2012-04-04T16:02:35Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Revise the API for GUC variable assign hooks.
- 2594cf0e8c04 9.1.0 cited
Scott Mead <scottm@openscg.com> writes: > Personally, I feel that if unix will let you be stupid: > $ export PATH=/usr/bin:/this/invalid/crazy/path > $ echo $PATH > /usr/bin:/this/invalid/crazy/path > PG should trust that I'll get where I'm going eventually :) Well, that's an interesting analogy. Are you arguing that we should always accept any syntactically-valid search_path setting, no matter whether the mentioned schemas exist? It wouldn't be hard to do that. The fun stuff comes in when you try to say "I want a warning in these contexts but not those", because (a) the behavior you think you want turns out to be pretty squishy, and (b) it's not always clear from the implementation level what the context is. regards, tom lane