Thread
-
Re: Another extensions bug
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> — 2011-08-24T04:49:22Z
I wrote: > ... So I'm thinking this recursive call should > just pass DEPFLAG_NORMAL in all cases: On further reflection, it seems more in keeping with the coding elsewhere in this module to treat this as a distinct dependency type, instead of confusing it with a NORMAL dependency. There's no actual functional difference at the moment, but more info is better than less. Hence, proposed patch attached (which also improves some of the related comments). regards, tom lane