Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-04-20T14:05:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> http://blog.metasploit.com/2010/02/postgres-fingerprinting.html

> Assuming the situation really is as described here, I am wondering if
> we should suppress the F, L, and R output in this and similar cases
> and back-patch it all the way back.  This seems like it is entirely
> too helpful.

[ yawn.. ]  I'm unimpressed: should we also ensure that neither ASCII
nor translated texts of authentication failure messages ever change?
IIRC, you were lobbying *for* such a change only a day or two ago.

			regards, tom lane