Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan@highrise.ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap@gmail.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-04-20T14:05:09Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > http://blog.metasploit.com/2010/02/postgres-fingerprinting.html > Assuming the situation really is as described here, I am wondering if > we should suppress the F, L, and R output in this and similar cases > and back-patch it all the way back. This seems like it is entirely > too helpful. [ yawn.. ] I'm unimpressed: should we also ensure that neither ASCII nor translated texts of authentication failure messages ever change? IIRC, you were lobbying *for* such a change only a day or two ago. regards, tom lane