Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>
Date: 2007-08-30T13:26:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it, 
> but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for 
> contrib.

I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of
the contrib docs, ie, put the docs under the noses of people who have
*not* installed or even heard of the modules.  So "it's not in the docs
unless you installed it" seems counter to the point.

			regards, tom lane