Re: [HACKERS] Contrib modules documentation online
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, pgsql-docs@postgresql.org, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Albert Cervera i Areny <albert@nan-tic.com>
Date: 2007-08-30T13:26:44Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > If you want to design a pluggable documentation system then go for it, > but it's not required by what I understand is the consensus plan for > contrib. I thought a large part of the desire was to improve the visibility of the contrib docs, ie, put the docs under the noses of people who have *not* installed or even heard of the modules. So "it's not in the docs unless you installed it" seems counter to the point. regards, tom lane