Re: libpq compression
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler@timbira.com>, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2012-06-17T15:42:18Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > Is there a reason why we don't have a parameter on the client > mirroring ssl_ciphers? Dunno, do we need one? I am not sure what the cipher negotiation process looks like or which side has the freedom to choose. > That, or just have DEFAULT as being the default (which in current > openssl means ALL:!aNULL:!eNULL. If our default isn't the same as the underlying default, I have to question why not. But are you sure this "!" notation will work with all openssl versions? regards, tom lane