Re: Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2010-03-17T21:17:42Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > That's a possibility, but we obviously have been adding columns > out-of-order for several releases now and no one has complained. On balance I'm for rationalizing this. The query_start time is logically associated with current_query and waiting, so it ought to be next to them. Without the historical fact that we've mucked with the column ordering before, I might've voted differently. regards, tom lane