Re: is_absolute_path incorrect on Windows
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2011-02-03T18:32:31Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: >>> I have reviewed is_absolute_path() and have implemented >>> path_is_relative_and_below_cwd() to cleanly handle cases like 'E:abc' on >>> Win32; patch attached. >> >> This patch appears to remove some security-critical restrictions. >> Why did you delete the path_contains_parent_reference calls? > They are now in path_is_relative_and_below_cwd(), ... and thus not invoked in the absolute-path case. This is a security hole. > I don't see a general reason to prevent > ".." in absolute paths, only relative ones. load '/path/to/database/../../../path/to/anywhere' regards, tom lane