Re: wrapping up this CommitFest (was Re: knngist - 0.8)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2011-03-01T20:41:21Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
Further refine patch for commenting operator implementation functions.
- 908ab8028640 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix citext's upgrade-from-unpackaged script to set its collation correctly.
- 94be9e3f0ca9 9.1.0 cited
-
Mark operator implementation functions as such in their comments.
- 94133a935414 9.1.0 cited
-
Add KNNGIST support to contrib/btree_gist.
- 8436489c81c2 9.1.0 cited
-
Fix plpython breakage detected on certain Fedora machines on buildfarm.
- 4c966d920fb7 9.1.0 cited
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > Bruce has been going through the open items for the past several weeks > (at least) and tells me that he hasn't found very much. I'm not sure > what your thought is on what's required to get us from here to beta, > but I am thinking it could be done in a few weeks. With a concerted > effort and some sustained focus, I don't see why we could get this > release out the door in, say, three months. Taking in a feature > that's going to take another month to sort out is going to push that > out, and I am really not excited about another round of > spend-all-summer-waiting-for-people-to-get-back-from-vacation-and-release-in-September. Yeah, it would be really nice to get the release out in June rather than September. If we wait any longer for Sync Rep I'm pretty sure it's going to be the latter not the former. See my nearby message for a start at a list of what we "must" do to get to alpha4. Any features we want to cram in at this stage go on top of that. regards, tom lane