Re: initdb and fsync
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Date: 2012-07-13T21:35:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
I wrote: > I'm picking up this patch now. What I'm inclined to do about the -N > business is to commit without that, so that we get a round of testing > in the buildfarm and find out about any portability issues, but then > change to use -N after a week or so. I agree that in the long run > we don't want regression tests to run with fsyncs by default. Committed without the -N in pg_regress (for now). I also stuck sync_file_range into the backend's pg_flush_data --- it would be interesting to hear measurements of whether that makes a noticeable difference for CREATE DATABASE. regards, tom lane