Re: [HACKERS] [postgresql 10 beta3] unrecognized node type: 90
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>,
"Adam,
Etienne (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <etienne.adam@nokia.com>,
PostgreSQL Bugs <pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org>,
"Duquesne,
Pierre (Nokia-TECH/Issy Les Moulineaux)" <pierre.duquesne@nokia.com>,
pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2017-08-15T13:46:09Z
Lists: pgsql-bugs, pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 7:31 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: >> Attached patch fixes the issue for me. I have locally verified that >> the gather merge gets executed in rescan path. I haven't added a test >> case for the same as having gather or gather merge on the inner side >> of join can be time-consuming. However, if you or others feel that it >> is important to have a test to cover this code path, then I can try to >> produce one. > Committed. > I believe that between this commit and the test-coverage commit from > Andres, this open item is reasonably well addressed. If someone > thinks more needs to be done, please specify. Thanks. How big a deal do we think test coverage is? It looks like ExecReScanGatherMerge is identical logic to ExecReScanGather, which *is* covered according to coverage.postgresql.org, but it wouldn't be too surprising if they diverge in future. I should think it wouldn't be that expensive to create a test case, if you already have test cases that invoke GatherMerge. Adding a right join against a VALUES clause with a small number of entries, and a non-mergeable/hashable join clause, ought to do it. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Separate reinitialization of shared parallel-scan state from ExecReScan.
- d6a149f4e6a1 10.0 landed
- 41b0dd987d44 11.0 landed
-
Restore test case from a2b70c89ca1a5fcf6181d3c777d82e7b83d2de1b.
- 6c2c5bea3cec 11.0 landed
- 5816ddc707e0 10.0 landed
-
Force rescanning of parallel-aware scan nodes below a Gather[Merge].
- 54eac6e8c552 10.0 landed
- 7df2c1f8daeb 11.0 landed
-
Fix ExecReScanGatherMerge.
- de1ca6919ff8 10.0 landed
- a2b70c89ca1a 11.0 landed
-
Add missing call to ExecReScanGatherMerge.
- 29990634c76a 10.0 landed
- 1295a777882b 11.0 landed