Horton

Re: Dubious usage of TYPCATEGORY_STRING

Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>

View thread View on postgr.es
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org
Date: 2021-12-11T19:12:06Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers 
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> On 07.12.21 21:24, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Um, I definitely gave up too easily there.  The one usage in \dp
>> seems to be the*only*  thing that breaks in describe.c, and pg_dump
>> doesn't need any changes so far as check-world reveals.  So let's
>> just move "char" to another category, as attached.

> Looks good to me.

Pushed, thanks for reviewing.

			regards, tom lane

Commits

  1. Create a new type category for "internal use" types.