Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?)
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Trond Eivind Glomsrød <teg@redhat.com>, The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2000-11-02T20:32:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > All I'm saying is that regression should be _runnable_ in all modes > without needing anything but a shell and the PostgreSQL binary > installation. I think this'd be mostly a waste of effort. IMHO, 99% of the problems the regression tests might expose will be exposed if they are run against the RPMs by the RPM maker. (Something we have sometimes failed to do in the past ;-).) The regress tests are not that good at detecting environment-specific problems; in fact, they go out of their way to suppress environmental differences. So I don't see any strong need to support regression test running in binary distributions. Especially not if we have to kluge around a lack of essential tools. regards, tom lane