Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros
Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
From: "Drouvot, Bertrand" <bertranddrouvot.pg@gmail.com>
To: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@lists.postgresql.org>
Date: 2022-12-04T05:07:37Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachments
- v4-0001-generate-some-pg_stat_get_-functions-with-macros.patch (text/plain) patch v4-0001
Hi, On 12/3/22 9:16 PM, Nathan Bossart wrote: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 10:31:19AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote: >> On 12/3/22 1:51 AM, Nathan Bossart wrote: >>> Can we hard-code the prefix in the macro? It looks like all of these use >>> the same one. >> >> Good point! Done in V2 attached. > > Thanks. I editorialized a bit in the attached v3. I'm not sure that my > proposed names for the macros are actually an improvement. WDYT? > Thanks! I do prefer the macros definition ordering that you're proposing (that makes pgstatfuncs.c "easier" to read). As far the names, I think it's better to replace "TAB" with "REL" (like in v4 attached): the reason is that those macros will be used in [1] for both tables and indexes stats (and so we'd have to replace "TAB" with "REL" in [1]). Having "REL" already in place reduces the changes that will be needed in [1]. [1]: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/f572abe7-a1bb-e13b-48c7-2ca150546822@gmail.com Regards, -- Bertrand Drouvot PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Commits
-
Fix macro definitions in pgstatfuncs.c
- 66dcb09246b4 16.0 landed
-
Generate pg_stat_get*() functions for databases using macros
- 8018ffbf5895 16.0 landed