Re: git: uh-oh

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 15:37, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Uh, no, not so. Marc used to use that ID for commits related to
>> pushing new versions. It's been retired, but there's nothing un-real
>> about the commits under that ID. Please pick something else. I thought
>> the suggestion of cvs2git was a good one.

> Ok, I'll switch to that - no problem. Should the name really be
> "PostgreSQL Daemon" then? (Because that's what it's called on the cvs
> box, but that's probably just a coincidence)

That seems to be the name that shows up in the pgsql-committers
archives, so I'd say we should stick with it.  We're not in the business
of redefining history here.

			regards, tom lane