Re: [Proposal] Global temporary tables
曾文旌 (义从) <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
From: 曾文旌 <wenjing.zwj@alibaba-inc.com>
To: Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com>
Cc: tushar <tushar.ahuja@enterprisedb.com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas.vondra@2ndquadrant.com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>, "蔡松露(子嘉)" <zijia@taobao.com>, "Cai, Le" <le.cai@alibaba-inc.com>, "萧少聪(铁庵)" <shaocong.xsc@alibaba-inc.com>
Date: 2020-03-27T05:25:33Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
PageAddItemExtended(): Add LP_UNUSED assertion.
- 30aaab26e521 14.0 cited
-
Remove temporary files after backend crash
- cd91de0d1795 14.0 cited
-
Fix comment in indexing.c
- 9fd2952cf492 14.0 cited
-
Fix failure to ignore leftover temp tables after a server crash.
- 6919b7e32947 9.3.0 cited
> 2020年3月26日 下午12:34,Prabhat Sahu <prabhat.sahu@enterprisedb.com> 写道: > > > Sorry, I introduced this bug in my refactoring. > It's been fixed. > > Wenjing > > Hi Wenjing, > This patch(gtt_v21_pg13.patch) is not applicable on PG HEAD, I hope you have prepared the patch on top of some previous commit. > Could you please rebase the patch which we can apply on HEAD ? Yes, It looks like the built-in functions are in conflict with new code. Wenjing > > -- > With Regards, > Prabhat Kumar Sahu > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com <http://www.enterprisedb.com/>