Re: Upgrading rant.
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>, Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>, mlw <pgsql@mohawksoft.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2003-01-06T04:10:08Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes: > It is very possible that the supporting libc shared libraries > will be removed by the OS upgrade -- the old binaries may not even run when > it is critical that they do run. Urgh, that's a mess. > If I can get older versions building again on newer systems, that will help > buy some breathing room from my point of view. Worst-case, we could include a back-rev postmaster binary in new distributions. However, that still requires us to keep the back revs buildable on newer OS releases, which evidently is less than trivial in the Linux world :-( regards, tom lane