Re: obsoleting plpython2u and defaulting plpythonu to plpython3u
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>
Cc: Pavel Raiskup <praiskup@redhat.com>,
Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>,
PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Date: 2018-04-27T17:34:58Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > Another alternative would be to have a 'plpython' extension that depends > on plpython2. That'd require users to specify CASCADE when creating it, > but that actually seems like it could be a useful hint... I think it's > probably not worth going that route though, because reassigning objects > from one extension to another is more work than reasonable... Yeah, there's a separate set of questions about what happens during pg_upgrade of a database containing the existing plpythonu extension. You could imagine hacking the dump/reload case by defining plpythonu as an empty extension with a dependency on plpython2u (or, maybe someday in future, a dependency on plpython3u). But that won't do the trick for binary upgrades; we might need special-case code in pg_dump/pg_upgrade to fix that. regards, tom lane
Commits
-
Adjust hints and docs to suggest CREATE EXTENSION not CREATE LANGUAGE.
- 2e83e6bd74ee 11.0 landed