Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2014-02-02T01:28:41Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Commits
Same data as JSON:
GET /api/v1/messages/:b64id/commits
the thread's linked commits as JSON, with link sources.
API reference →
-
MinGW: Link with shell32.dll instead of shfolder.dll.
- 53566fc0940c 9.5.0 cited
-
Centralize getopt-related declarations in a new header file pg_getopt.h.
- 60ff2fdd9970 9.4.0 cited
-
Get rid of use of dlltool in Mingw builds.
- 846e91e0223c 9.4.0 cited
-
Export a few more symbols required for test_shm_mq module.
- 7d7eee8bb702 9.4.0 cited
-
Export set_latch_on_sigusr1 symbol for Windows.
- 708c529c7fde 9.4.0 cited
-
Use SHGetFolderPath instead of SHGetSpecialFolderPath to find the
- 889f03812916 8.1.0 cited
Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 2014-02-01 20:03:58 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think we should give serious consideration to desupporting this >> combination so that we can get rid of the plague of PGDLLIMPORT >> marks. Obviously this would depend on confirming that there are >> no more-interesting Windows build methods that require it --- but >> if there are any, I'd sure demand that there be an active buildfarm >> instance to keep us from breaking the case again in future. > Weren't there more recent cases of needing to add PGDLLIMPORTs? Yeah, which makes the plot even thicker. If references to those variables failed, how did we not notice postgres_fdw's issue? I don't claim to know exactly what's going on, but I think we need to find out. regards, tom lane