Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
From: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>, pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
Date: 2010-04-27T22:08:29Z
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes: > On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 17:24 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I think we should just lose that test, as well as the variable. > Yes, though it looks like it is still necessary in creating a valid > initial state because otherwise we may have xids in KnownAssigned array > that are already complete. Huh? How is a filter as coarse as an oldest-running-XID filter going to prevent that? And aren't we initializing from trustworthy data in ProcArrayApplyRecoveryInfo, anyway? I still say it's useless. regards, tom lane